Executive Summary
This report analyses community-submitted telecommunications safety data across Tasmania between 1–30 April 2025. All classifications, trend observations, and regional patterns are derived from first-hand community intelligence aggregated through the Reverseau platform.
Tasmania recorded 46 community reports across 35 unique phone numbers during the reporting period. Compared to March 2025, reporting volume showed a notable decrease of 58%, while 35 numbers remained under active community monitoring throughout the month.
Scam remains the most frequently assigned community classification at 46% of categorised reports, with a scam classification ratio of 46% across all submissions. Scam maintained its position as the dominant classification in both periods, suggesting sustained targeting patterns rather than campaign rotation.
Geographically, reporting activity was concentrated in Hobart, followed by Devonport and Huonville. Hobart recorded more than double the reporting volume of the next most active locality (Devonport), indicating concentrated campaign activity or higher community engagement within this area.
April coincides with peak tax scam season as the end of the Australian financial year approaches. ATO impersonation campaigns historically surge during this month.
With scam classifications representing 46% of reports, the data indicates active but not overwhelming targeting levels within Tasmania. Residents are encouraged to report suspicious telecommunications activity and consult the TAS data dashboard for real-time classification and trend data.
Why This Matters
The proportion of scam-classified reports at 46% indicates active but evolving targeting patterns across Tasmania. Understanding these patterns at a community level enables faster identification of emerging campaign types and reduces the window between first contact and community-wide awareness. Sustained reporting activity across multiple localities strengthens the collective intelligence foundation, allowing classification convergence to accelerate as more residents contribute first-hand safety data to the TAS reporting ecosystem.
Scam Category Breakdown
Community classification distribution across TAS for the period 1–30 April 2025. Classifications are assigned by reporting users based on their direct experience with each number.
Scam accounted for 46% of categorised reports during April 2025. In March 2025, Scam held the top position with 57% of classifications. Scam maintained its position as the dominant classification in both periods, suggesting sustained targeting patterns rather than campaign rotation.
Most Affected Areas in Tasmania
Localities with the highest concentration of community reports during 1–30 April 2025. Each locality links to its dedicated intelligence page with full classification breakdowns and number listings.
Hobart recorded more than double the reporting volume of the next most active locality (Devonport), indicating concentrated campaign activity or higher community engagement within this area. For detailed locality-level analysis, visit the individual area pages linked above or explore the TAS data dashboard.
Month-to-Month Comparison
Compared to March 2025, Tasmania experienced a notable decrease of 58% in community reporting volume. Overall activity has decreased, with moderate monitoring coverage across the state.
Seasonal Context
April coincides with peak tax scam season as the end of the Australian financial year approaches. ATO impersonation campaigns historically surge during this month. The observed decrease of 58% may reflect seasonal reporting variation, reduced campaign activity, or shifts in community engagement patterns during this period.
Classification Movement
Scam classifications accounted for 46% of categorised reports in April, with scam-specific reports representing 46% of all submissions. These shifts in community classification patterns may reflect evolving campaign tactics, changes in the types of numbers being reported, or natural variation in reporting behaviour between periods. Monitoring classification movement over consecutive months provides a more reliable indicator of genuine trend shifts than any single-month comparison.
Regional Variation
Hobart maintained its position as the most active reporting locality even as overall volumes declined. This persistence suggests that reporting behaviour in metropolitan areas is more resilient to volume fluctuations than regional submissions.
Service Type Distribution
Local Service numbers account for 100% of reported activity, reflecting the broader national pattern where mobile-originated calls dominate community safety reports. Residents should exercise particular caution with unsolicited calls from unfamiliar local service numbers.
Emerging Trends & Observations
Several numbers exhibited accelerated reporting velocity within compressed time windows, followed by classification convergence toward scam designation.
Rapid Accumulation Signals
1 number within TAS accumulated multiple community reports within a compressed time window during 1–30 April 2025. This velocity pattern is consistent with active call campaigns or coordinated targeting activity. Numbers exhibiting rapid report accumulation frequently transition from initial “Unknown” or “Suspicious” classifications to confirmed “Scam” designation within days.
Numbers flagged for rapid accumulation averaged 7 reports each during the period, indicating sustained community engagement with these numbers rather than isolated encounters.
Divergent Classification Signals
Several numbers display mixed community classifications — receiving both scam and non-scam reports during April 2025. This divergence may indicate numbers transitioning between legitimate and illegitimate use, caller ID spoofing of legitimate business numbers, or community uncertainty about the nature of calls received. Numbers with divergent classifications warrant continued monitoring as community consensus develops.
Community Safety Guidance
- Do not return missed calls from unknown 03 numbers without verification.
- Verify any government agency claims through official websites or published contact numbers — the ATO, Centrelink, and Medicare will never threaten immediate action via phone.
- Avoid clicking payment or delivery links received via SMS from unrecognised senders.
- Report suspicious telecommunications activity to help build community safety intelligence for Tasmania.
- Check numbers on Reverseau before returning calls from unknown sources.
Data Methodology
This report is compiled from community-submitted telecommunications safety reports for the period 1–30 April 2025. All data is aggregated and anonymised before publication.
- Source: First-hand community reports submitted via Reverseau.
- Scope: Numbers with a registered allocation within Tasmania (TAS).
- Period: 1–30 April 2025 (calendar month).
- Classifications: Assigned by reporting users based on their direct experience.
- Limitations: Data reflects community perception, not verified telecommunications records. Reporting volumes are influenced by platform adoption and user engagement patterns.
For detailed methodology, see our methodology page. For the full analytical dataset, visit the TAS data dashboard.