Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as scam, spam, legitimate, and uncertain, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Scam
- 2 community reports
- Spam
- 2 community reports
- Legitimate
- 2 community reports
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
This company claims to be a pet services provider, but they are trying to sell solar equipment instead. It seems like a scam using the name of a legitimate company as a cover.
This number called my mobile tonight at 7:15 pm.
They didn't leave a message.
After reading the above reviews I have now blocked.
This number has called me twice today. No message left either time. Ive blocked it as a scam caller.
Don’t know who called, it is unknown to me and therefore likely spam.
This number rang, but did not leave a message. I presume it to be a scam. Looked at the above comment and if it is animal welfare calling from WA, why are they trying to get donations from SA. Have blocked the number now.
The caller was Australian Pet Welfare Foundation - a registered charity. WA based, calling east coast of NSW. Number is blocked.
This number called me, and they had previously contacted me with a similar number a couple of days ago. I automatically block calls from outside my area, especially since I'm based in Western Australia, and I believe they should focus on residents in WA rather than those on the east coast of the country.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.