Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as spam, scam, suspicious, and uncertain, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Spam
- 3 community reports
- Scam
- 2 community reports
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Community reports describe patterns reporting users considered potentially harmful. Avoid sharing personal information or verification codes unless you independently confirm the caller's identity.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
I called this number back twice and spoke to two different individuals. The first claimed to be conducting a government survey about homeownership, while the second identified themselves as representing green energy solutions. This inconsistency feels suspicious.
The caller introduced himself as Jacob and seemed to know my name. He mentioned he was promoting a solar energy rebate program and inquired if I owned solar panels. When I replied that I did not have any solar panels and that I didn't own my home, he abruptly hung up on me.
The caller inquired whether I had solar panels installed or if I was interested in purchasing some. I informed them that I live in a caravan, which makes the offer irrelevant to me.
I received a scam call from a number claiming to be from Green Solar. The caller had an Indian accent, and I suspect this is another fraudulent attempt at soliciting money.
I received a call from this number where the caller said nothing and hung up abruptly after about three seconds. This behavior is often associated with spam calls.
The caller claimed to be from the government conducting a survey about homeowners. I found the call suspicious and chose to hang up.
The caller claimed to be from Commonwealth Bank, stating that there was an issue with a card transaction. The call sounded robotic, and I hung up without providing any information.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.