Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as scam, suspicious, uncertain, and spam, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Scam
- 3 community reports
- Suspicious
- 2 community reports
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
- Spam
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Community reports describe patterns reporting users considered potentially harmful. Avoid sharing personal information or verification codes unless you independently confirm the caller's identity.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
I did not recognize any names associated with this landline number from Adelaide, so I decided not to answer. They did not leave a voicemail message either.
The caller introduced herself as 'Kim' from 'Prime Wealth Advisory.' When I asked how she obtained my number, she claimed they purchased it and mentioned they were not allowed to make cold calls. However, I found this to be suspicious since her call was indeed unsolicited. I recommend blocking the number to avoid any hassle.
Scam!
Claimed to be a solar power company. Suspect scam.
Cheers for that, just received a call today aswell. Also a couple of days ago.
Received call from this number, my phone marked it as a suspected spam - said it was an Adelaide number, I phoned it back and it was just an american bot voice saying the number you are calling is not connected. Safe to say it is best not to answer this one.
I missed a call from this number, and when I tried to call back, I received a recorded message saying, "the number you have dialed is not in service. Please check the number before calling again." This makes me suspect that it was a scammer trying to reach me.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.