Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (5 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
Community submissions describe mixed interactions associated with this number.
Reports include:
- Legit (4 reports)
- Suspicious (1 report)
Current reporting volume indicates emerging community safety signals.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Legitimate
- 4 community reports
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
HBF calling back regarding my earlier telephone conversation with them. Asked me to verify my identity so they knew they were talking to the right person. I refused as they already have my details & know who I am. They said they could email me, however, would also need me to reply to questions in the email to verify my identity. Only course of action was to re-call them & waste time on hold. Ridiculous waste of my time. Totally unimpressed, HBF needs to do better.
This number is reportedly from HBF, attempting to verify the legitimacy of a claim.
This isn't scammers it's HBF (private health).
It's HBF.
It cannot be so hard to identify who this number belongs to. Not listed in white pages either. Whoever calls does not leave a message therefore must be treated with suspicion. Until proven otherwise will be treated as a scam number and rejected out of hand.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.