Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
The predominant classification is legit, accounting for 71% of reports, with additional spam, suspicious interactions also recorded.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Legitimate
- 5 community reports
- Spam
- 1 community report
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
I received a voicemail indicating that the caller was reaching out on behalf of one of their charity partners, but there were no specific details provided.
Phoned back. Friendly message (female voice I presume) saying they are calling on behalf of one of their charities, and will try again later.
I blocked number as I'm not interested.
P.S. Don't click on Facebook Ads for any info as this is mostly where all the calls are generated from. I've learned the hard way!
Amnesty international.
Listened to the vmail; sounded kind of scratchy then a man’s voice said hello in a fed up and angered delivery… just one word and he seemed that p**sed off. Went back to scratchy and ended. Called it back and voice service said smart health Australia on behalf of Charlie’s research foundation. Follows by saying, to opt out of the call list please visit… xyz.
Smarthealth australia calling on behalf of a health research charity.
Called back, answering machine says "Lighthouse Australia working on behalf of Charlie's foundation for research"???
The caller left a voicemail, but it sounded as if they had forgotten to hang up, resulting in a scratchy audio with background noise. I assume this might be from a call center.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.