Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (9 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
9 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as spam, scam, suspicious, and legitimate, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Spam
- 4 community reports
- Scam
- 2 community reports
- Suspicious
- 2 community reports
- Legitimate
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
The same numbers, (03) 5616 2010, (03) 5915 9757, and (02) 8073 4175, are associated with rude representatives who stubbornly claim their legitimacy.
Scammers for sure, they keep calling.
I answered the call, but the caller on the other end went silent and then hung up. I've since blocked the number.
I received a spam call from this number but chose not to answer it, as I suspected it might be a scam.
Based on what many others have reported, I suspect this is a scam call as well. I answer calls from unfamiliar numbers cautiously.
The call from this number showed up on my phone as a "suspected fraud" call, so I decided it was best not to answer it.
I received a call from this number tonight but did not answer as I suspect it to be from a spam caller.
I received a call from this number labeled as "suspected spam" and chose not to answer. They called again today from a similar number, 5345 6437, which also appeared as "suspected spam," so I did not answer that call either.
When I called this number back, a robotic answering machine introduced themselves as "Charity Prime." I noted that the incoming number was registered from Caloundra in the Sunshine Coast, QLD, which raised my concerns about its legitimacy.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.