Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (6 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
6 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
The predominant classification is scam, accounting for 67% of reports, with additional suspicious, uncertain interactions also recorded.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Scam
- 4 community reports
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Community reports describe patterns reporting users considered potentially harmful. Avoid sharing personal information or verification codes unless you independently confirm the caller's identity.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
The caller claimed there was an issue with a $200 gift card that I had purchased. When I explained that this was a business phone and expressed my disbelief, the caller hung up instantly. This raised my suspicion about the legitimacy of their claim.
I received a recorded message regarding a transaction of a certain amount on my account. The problem is, I don’t hold any accounts with that bank. The message also prompted me to press specific numbers to cancel this transaction, which sounds suspicious.
The caller threatened to withdraw $399 from my account, and then they hung up.
I tried to call this number back multiple times, but they kept hanging up on me whenever I asked straightforward questions. Eventually, one polite young man accused me of being hacked, which seemed odd. At least I felt satisfaction in wasting their time!
I received a call from this number; it rang but did not leave a message. This is likely another spam call, which is becoming increasingly common.
This call was reportedly from Bundaberg, Australia, but the caller hung up immediately. They left a robotic voicemail stating that I was due for a refund (without specifying for what) and instructed me to call back, which raises red flags about the legitimacy of the call.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.