Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (9 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
9 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
The predominant classification is scam, accounting for 78% of reports, with additional spam, suspicious interactions also recorded.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Scam
- 7 community reports
- Spam
- 1 community report
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Community reports describe patterns reporting users considered potentially harmful. Avoid sharing personal information or verification codes unless you independently confirm the caller's identity.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
My experience was identical—there was no response when I attempted to communicate, making me feel like I was just being silent on the line.
My telecommunications provider automatically identified this call as spam and blocked it.
I only received a missed call from this number, but my Truecaller app blocked it immediately. After reading various comments about this number, I am relieved that I did not answer it.
After reading multiple negative reviews about this caller, I decided to block the number immediately.
No voice, no noise. More than likely they are recording your voice, to later impersonate you in a scam. Voice ID.
Warning! This caller exhibited alarming behavior; he was breathing heavily and speaking in an incoherent manner. He didn't respond when I attempted to call back, which raises serious concerns about his intentions.
My Samsung phone’s "Caller ID and SPAM Protection" feature blocks calls from this number every single time.
I got a call from this number, but when I answered and said "hello" multiple times, no one responded. I researched the number online and came across similar reports, so I decided to block the caller.
I answered the call and said hello, but there was no response. After seeing similar complaints about this number, I decided to block it.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.