Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as legitimate, suspicious, scam, and uncertain, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Legitimate
- 3 community reports
- Suspicious
- 2 community reports
- Scam
- 1 community report
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
I got a call from this number confirming my mum’s address just to make sure they get her home safely – it’s from a non-urgent line for Tasmania Police, so don’t stress.
The person on the line claimed I pocket dialed them; they identified themselves as Tasmania police and called very late at 12:30 AM. The conversation was strange, and I have concerns they may be tracking calls.
This phone number connects to the Tasmania Police Mental Health Team. If you are receiving calls from them, it may indicate that someone has reported you as a potential danger, which could explain the unusual nature of their calls.
They reached out claiming they wanted to confirm my phone number, but it’s concerning how they obtained my information in the first place. They mentioned a stolen bicycle, but their story seemed confusing and unconvincing.
I received a return call from a non-emergency police number.
I received a call early in the morning, but by the time I answered and realized it was a private number, the caller had already hung up.
This number reported that my car has been seen abandoned on Goodwin Street. I'm not sure who this is, but it raises concerns about my vehicle's safety.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.