Community Safety Intelligence Report

(03) 5753 3125

Community Risk Level: Emerging Risk

Community reports suggest an emerging reporting pattern. Classification may evolve as further data is submitted.

12 Reports

Also searched as: 03 5753 3125 · 0357533125 · +61 3 5753 3125

All formats refer to the same number record.

12 independent community reports
Confidence: Moderate Confidence reflects reporting volume, not certainty of intent.
Last reported: 27 September 2022
  • Suspicious – 5
  • Scam – 2
  • Spam – 2
  • Uncertain – 2
  • Legit – 1
Public Safety Advisory
Guidance for Call Recipients

Based on community reports, some interactions were reported as legitimate while others indicate potential risk. Exercise caution if you receive unexpected requests. Do not share sensitive information unless you can independently verify the caller.

Reverseau independently aggregates community-reported safety intelligence and does not determine caller identity or intent.

Developed in alignment with Australian consumer safety awareness principles.

Reported Interaction Types
Suspicious Scam Spam Uncertain Legit
Number Metadata
Local service Benalla, VIC 3672

This page summarises community-reported safety information associated with this number and is intended for public awareness and harm prevention.

Community Risk Assessment

Emerging Risk
Based on 12 community-submitted reports Analytical Confidence: Moderate
Suspicious
42%
Scam
17%
Spam
17%
Uncertain
17%
Legit
8%

Evidence Status

Community Reporting Summary

12 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.

Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as suspicious, scam, spam, uncertain, and legitimate, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.

Number Metadata

Observed Interaction Types

Suspicious
5 community reports
Scam
2 community reports
Spam
2 community reports
Uncertain
2 community reports
Legitimate
1 community report

Safety Context

Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.

About This Record

This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.

Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.

Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.

Contribute a Community Safety Report

Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.

SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORT

Reports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.

Community Safety Reports

Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.

Community Reporting Overview
12 total reports · Classification distribution:
Suspicious (5) · Scam (2) · Spam (2) · Uncertain (2) · Legitimate (1)
Pattern Status: Mixed reporting pattern observed (no dominant classification)
Reporting timeframe: February 2022 – September 2022

Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.

The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.

M
Mathey
Suspicious

This number called me, but my phone did not recognize it, so I decided to let it ring. After waiting for a few minutes to see if they’d leave a voicemail, I noticed that they did not, so I chose to block the number.

L
Lyde
Suspicious

I received a call that rang but didn’t leave a message. According to other reports I've seen, it seems to be associated with a charity, so I plan on blocking this number.

S
Styer
Scam

This call appears to be from scammers who are using fake phone numbers. They are attempting to obtain credit card information, which suggests malicious intent.

P
Proffit
Suspicious

I received a call from a number that I did not recognize. I chose to let it go to voicemail, but they did not leave a message. This is very annoying.

S
Stubbe
Scam

The caller claimed to be representing a charity, but I suspect this is just another way for scammers to exploit people. I really wish the government would take stronger action against these persistent scammers.

B
Bazar
Spam

This caller is very persistent and continues to contact me despite my attempts to ignore them. Their refusal to take "no" for an answer is quite frustrating.

B
Battle
Suspicious

I did not recognize this number, so I let it go to voicemail, but they didn't leave a message.

S
Spina
Suspicious

This number has been calling me every day. It’s becoming very annoying and disruptive.

K
Kohn
Uncertain

The caller did not leave a voicemail message, but I decided to return the call to find out who it was.

R
Rosato
Uncertain

Charity Prime source?

A
Anonymous
Legit

Charity.

N
Nolen
Spam

Telemarketing for charity caller.

Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.

Contribute a Community Safety Report

Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.

SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORT

Reports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.