Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (6 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
6 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
The predominant classification is spam, accounting for 67% of reports, with additional scam, suspicious interactions also recorded.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Spam
- 4 community reports
- Scam
- 1 community report
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Community reports describe patterns reporting users considered potentially harmful. Avoid sharing personal information or verification codes unless you independently confirm the caller's identity.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
I received a second call from a similar number identifying itself as “Bridgewater.” Since I had already blocked a previous number from them, I found it concerning that they used a slightly altered number to call me again. I have blocked this new number as well.
I have been receiving frequent calls from various numbers asking if I am interested in a loan, despite informing them that I am not. This has become a form of harassment, as they continue to call repeatedly.
The caller ID displayed Bridgewater, Victoria, but they did not leave any message, leading me to block their number for my peace of mind.
Marketing call. Also received from 03 5496 0255.
During the call, they asked if I wanted to apply for a loan, either for a car or a house. When I declined and said no, they just hung up.
This number inadvertently left a voicemail where I could hear background noise typical of a call center. I decided to block the number immediately after that.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.