Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (6 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
6 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as spam, scam, legitimate, uncertain, and suspicious, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Spam
- 2 community reports
- Scam
- 1 community report
- Legitimate
- 1 community report
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
I received a call from a robotic voice speaking in an Asian accent, claiming to be from the immigration department. They said they had tried to contact me multiple times. Since I have no involvement with immigration, I recognize this as a scam.
This number rang but I received no message. Interestingly, my husband received a call from the same number and they left a voicemail in an Asian language, which I couldn't understand.
I got a call from Minyip, Victoria. The caller left a message in an Asian language that I couldn't understand.
This number called but rang briefly and did not leave a message. It is unclear why they called or what their intentions were.
This number left a voicemail that sounded robotic and generic. It clearly feels like spam, and I would recommend avoiding engagement.
The caller was inquiring about immigration paperwork, which seemed unusual and unsolicited.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.