Community Safety Intelligence Report

(03) 5216 9944

Community Risk Level: Elevated

Aggregated community reports currently reflect a developing pattern of unwanted contact.

7 Reports

Also searched as: 03 5216 9944 · 0352169944 · +61 3 5216 9944

All formats refer to the same number record.

7 independent community reports
Confidence: Moderate Confidence reflects reporting volume, not certainty of intent.
Last reported: 3 August 2018
  • Spam – 5
  • Uncertain – 2
Public Safety Advisory
Guidance for Call Recipients

Based on community reports, this number has been associated with unsolicited or potentially harmful calls. Exercise caution and do not share sensitive information unless you can independently verify the caller.

Reverseau independently aggregates community-reported safety intelligence and does not determine caller identity or intent.

Developed in alignment with Australian consumer safety awareness principles.

Reported Interaction Types
Spam Uncertain
Number Metadata
Local service Queenscliff, VIC 3225

This page summarises community-reported safety information associated with this number and is intended for public awareness and harm prevention.

Community Risk Assessment

Elevated
Based on 7 community-submitted reports Analytical Confidence: Moderate
Spam
71%
Uncertain
29%

Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).

Evidence Status

Reporting volume
Moderate (7 reports)
Pattern consistency
Dominant classification: Spam
Temporal coverage
Active reporting period
Signal convergence
High

Community Reporting Summary

7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.

The predominant classification is spam, accounting for 71% of reports, with additional uncertain interactions also recorded.

Number Metadata

Number type
Local service
Registered locality
Queenscliff, VIC 3225
Telecommunications provider
Primus Telecommunications Pty Limited
Normalised number
0352169944 (format used for aggregation)

Location and carrier data are sourced from publicly available numbering records. Reverseau does not verify caller identity, intent, or business ownership. Information is presented for public safety awareness purposes only.

Observed Interaction Types

Spam
5 community reports
Uncertain
2 community reports

Safety Context

Community reports describe patterns reporting users considered potentially harmful. Avoid sharing personal information or verification codes unless you independently confirm the caller's identity.

About This Record

This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.

Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.

Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.

Contribute a Community Safety Report

Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.

SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORT

Reports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.

Community Safety Reports

Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.

Community Reporting Overview
7 total reports · Classification distribution:
Spam (5) · Uncertain (2)
Pattern Status: Consistent spam-related reporting trend
Reporting timeframe: April 2018 – August 2018

Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.

These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.

The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.

L
Lambert
Spam User-submitted

Energy company, spam calls.

E
Edmond
Uncertain User-submitted

My mum has been getting reoccurring calls from this number.

C
Cashwell
Spam User-submitted

I answered this unknown to me number.. Only to be thrashed around and be told to listen, no! How about you listen and actually hear what I’m saying. I’m very well aware of the price hikes of energy suppliers and if I ever choose to change companies I’ll call you... He then says since your busy I’ll call you back... I replied with ‘again you’re not hearing me!’ Delete my number so I don’t have to answer nuisance calls.

C
Cadigan
Spam User-submitted

Compare energy account. telemarketer.

G
Gracy
Spam User-submitted

Called twice today, phone says queenscliff. No message left. Would suggest it is telemarketing.

H
Holton
Spam User-submitted

Possibly; telemarketer.... (unknown & no previous calls from this number: called today, I didn't answer.... No voicemail left;.

Therefore possible telemarketer/scammer?

I'm blocking this number.

H
Hargraves
Uncertain User-submitted

Rang twice during morning. Did not leave message.

Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.

Contribute a Community Safety Report

Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.

SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORT

Reports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.