Community Risk Assessment
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
10 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as suspicious, spam, uncertain, legitimate, and scam, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Suspicious
- 5 community reports
- Spam
- 2 community reports
- Uncertain
- 1 community report
- Legitimate
- 1 community report
- Scam
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
Missed call, no message left, number not known to me BLOCKED, DELETED.
Precision Connect (SHA) - Telemarketer for charity.
Said Amnesty International did wait for what they wanted hung up.
Charity.
I missed a call from this number, and it continues to ring me. This is the third time it has called in just two days. Even after marking it as spam and blocking the number, the calls keep coming through. It seems that this scammer has found a way to bypass the blocking feature on my new Samsung phone, which is very frustrating!
The number called but did not leave a message. My caller ID indicated the call was from Parramatta. I've decided to block this number due to the lack of information.
I got a call from a Sydney number, but they didn't leave any message. I’ve chosen to block and delete this contact due to the lack of information.
I missed a call from this number, and when I attempted to call back, I reached a recording stating: "Thank you for calling Precision Connect. We have tried to contact you on behalf of one of our charity partners. Unfortunately, all of our operators are currently busy. Please leave a message after the tone."
This number called me as well, but they didn’t leave a voicemail. The call occurred on December 2, 2024.
I received a call from this number on my mobile, but they did not leave a voicemail message.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.