Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (7 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
7 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
Reported classifications are distributed across multiple classification types, including classifications such as scam, suspicious, spam, and legitimate, indicating no dominant behavioural pattern at this time.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Scam
- 3 community reports
- Suspicious
- 2 community reports
- Spam
- 1 community report
- Legitimate
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
Scammers.
I chose not to answer this call since I didn't recognize the number. After researching it online and seeing other users' comments, I decided to block the number for safety reasons.
They left a message indicating they were from a company called Ikon, but did not provide any further details.
Prerecorded scammer telling me my mobile phone number will be deactivated, yeah sure mate.
I received a call from this number, but I'm unsure of their identity. However, it seems likely that this is a scam attempt based on the circumstances.
I suspect this was a scam call since they left a voicemail containing dialogue in an Asian language, making it seem suspicious.
I got a call from this number on Friday, but there were no words spoken—just laughter that I found quite odd. I attempted to return the call but was unsuccessful. The incoming call showed as being from Bungendore, and I'm unclear if it's a scam or a prank.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.