Community Risk Assessment
Percentages reflect relative distribution within a small reporting sample (8 reports).
Evidence Status
Community Reporting Summary
8 independent community reports have been recorded for this number.
The predominant classification is spam, accounting for 63% of reports, with additional suspicious, legitimate, scam interactions also recorded.
Number Metadata
Observed Interaction Types
- Spam
- 5 community reports
- Suspicious
- 1 community report
- Legitimate
- 1 community report
- Scam
- 1 community report
Safety Context
Current reporting does not indicate a consistent behavioural pattern or dominant risk classification. Standard telecommunications safety precautions are generally advised when responding to unexpected or unsolicited contact.
About This Record
This page forms part of the Reverseau public safety intelligence database, which aggregates community-reported telecommunications safety information across Australia.
Records update automatically as new reports are submitted. Records may exist prior to receiving community reports in order to support proactive telecommunications safety monitoring and future reporting.
Reverseau maintains this database as a continuously updated public safety dataset designed to support telecommunications risk awareness across Australia. Reverseau does not determine liability, intent, or identity. Records reflect aggregated community-submitted signals only.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.
Community Safety Reports
Classifications reflect anonymised community-submitted reports and represent observed interaction patterns only. They do not identify callers or constitute verified findings.
Pattern status reflects statistical distribution of community reports and does not indicate verified activity.
These reports contribute to the Community Risk Level and Confidence assessment shown above.
The following reports are user-submitted and not independently verified. Consider them alongside the aggregated signals above.
The caller did not leave a message, which suggests they are likely a nuisance or spam.
I was contacted by individuals who were very insistent in their requests for large donations. They were pushy and refused to take no for an answer, which was quite off-putting.
Fundraiser.
Spam call.
This number is associated with charity calls, and I receive about two calls a day from the same individual, which is quite bothersome.
Persistant scam.
I received a call with a bubbly prerecorded message. It seemed like a sales pitch or a solicitation for donations, so I hung up and blocked the number.
I am sick of these random calls I have had 8 today and similar amounts everyday for the last 2 weeks the numbers are almost the same with only one or two different digits I have had them before but they stopped for awhile but have now started in force again.
Community reports are retained as historical safety signals within the Reverseau telecommunications safety dataset and may reflect different experiences over time.
Contribute a Community Safety Report
Additional reports help improve classification confidence and public safety awareness.
SUBMIT A SAFETY REPORTReports contribute anonymised observational data used for pattern analysis.