- Uncertain
Discover the details surrounding the phone number 03 9996 8375, reported as suspicious. Learn how to handle calls from this number and protect yourself from potential telemarketing scams.
What Do We Know About 03 9996 8375?
The phone number 03 9996 8375 / 0399968375 has been noted by users as suspicious in nature. It appears to possibly belong to a telemarketer attempting to reach consumers but has elicited unease among those who have encountered it. One user report dated 01/07/2024 highlights that the caller rang twice without receiving a response.
Classification of the Number
Based on user reviews, this number falls under the 'suspicious' category. This classification is supported by the lack of identified callers and the unsolicited nature of the calls many people experience. Such patterns are often indicative of telemarketers, which can be bothersome to many individuals.
What Actions Can You Take?
If you receive a call from 03 9996 8375 / 0399968375, the essential recommendation is to remain cautious. Here are a few steps you can take:
- Screen Your Calls: If you do not recognise the number, consider letting it go to voicemail. Legitimate callers will usually leave a message.
- Use Reverse Phone Lookup Australia: To unearth details about the number caller, consider using services such as Reverseau.
- Report the Number: If you find that the calls are persistent and bothersome, reporting the number to the appropriate Australian authorities may help in curtailing the annoyance.
- Don’t Engage: If you do answer and suspect the call is not legitimate, it’s best to end the call rather than engage with the caller.
In summary, 03 9996 8375 / 0399968375 might be linked to telemarketing efforts, and with only one user report as evidence, it’s prudent to treat it with caution. Always prioritise your safety and privacy when dealing with unknown numbers.
Help others by sharing your experience with (03) 9996 8375!
WRITE A REVIEWRatings Distribution
What Our Users Reviewed
Someone called me twice from this number, but I chose not to answer either time.